September 01, 2026 • 1 min read • Originally published on Linkedin
Gaussian Splats versus 3D Meshes
Gaussian splats for 3D visualization are visually compelling, but how do they compare to 3D meshes? Great article delves into the nuances and tradeoffs of each.
A quick comparison:
-
Gaussian Splatting: Radiance fields optimized for photorealistic novel view synthesis; fast rendering of complex soft boundaries (vegetation, reflections); computationally expensive to edit or simulate physics against.
-
3D Meshes: Precise discrete geometry; native support for collisions, spatial joins, texturing, and CAD/GIS engineering pipelines; struggles with hyper-complex natural geometries without huge polygon counts.
-
The Verdict/Workflow: Splats for realistic situational awareness/digital twins; meshes for engineering measurements and spatial queries.
More on the ESRI blog: ArcGIS Blog
Related Thoughts
Perspectives sharing related architectures, models, and domain context.
Everyone's Thinking Spatially Even If They Don't Call It Geography
Matt Forrest shared a story that struck a chord with me. He talked about winning an atlas in a third grade contest and...
Telling Stories with Data
Telling a story with data can be impactful and compelling. Anselm Hook has an interesting approach that builds on top...
America.gov, APIs, and the Future of Public Information
The recent conversation around America.gov highlights something that has been building for years. Something I've been...